Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Oh Craig.

There's a very interesting discussion going on over at Feministing.org about the marketing campaign for Craig Brewer's latest film, Black Snake Moan. I saw Brewer's two previous cinematic efforts and, for the most part, liked them. I haven't seen Black Snake Moan, as it hasn't yet been released in theatres, but I have to wonder why he continues to make films that exoticize the citizens of the South, the Deep South, in particular.

I guess a lot of male directors pick their "theme" and run with it: Spielberg and his "daddy" issues, Scorcese and his hyper-masculine violence, and Allen and his numerous neuroses. What's odd is that these celebrated directors get all the financing in Hollywood and keep churning out misogynist film after misogynist film.

What really saddens me is Christina Ricci. She was once an indie darling, an actor who was not only a good performer, but a unique individual whose talents brought interest to the big screen. Now she looks just like every other withering brittle-haired starlet. I'm not holding out much hope that this particular role will do anything besides confirm the long-held backwards notions of our society that abused women are damaged goods, only worthy of further abuse.

Can somebody please annouce that we're in the 21st century?!

5 comments:

Em said...

I saw a preview for this, and thanks to DVR, watched it a couple of times just thinking "WTF"?
My conclusion...I'm just going to stay away from any movies that has the word "snake" in the title.

tiny robot said...

Good point...I'm wondering if the word "snake" has to be in the title of the movie for Sam Jackson to star? Perhaps it's in his contract?

Prophet said...

you know they did a pre-screening here in little ole starkville two weeks ago for BSM at the magnolia film festival. unfortunately i missed it. i did a review of the trailer for my adv. tv prod class, and i really want to see it. maybe i should see snakes on a plane first though...

Anonymous said...

I agree with you T. I read Slate's review of it and it sickened me. But what sickened me even more? Seeing a preview last night and hearing Mr. Wonderful say "I've heard good things about that" in a kind of "we should go see that" kind of voice. I went off. "It's a fetish film," I argued. He said "there's a twist." I said "what, that they become best friends at the end? It's a fetish film, that's all."
So that's that.
~The Booklahver

tiny robot said...

Apparently they do become pals at the end when the Ricci character is "healed" of her "hoochie" ways.

I know. Giant eye roll.

If the film actually addressed the core issues presented (race relations, sexual abuse, misogyny, and violence against women) perhaps I'd go see it. However, it seems these issues are merely prop pieces in an obvious homage to exploitation filmmaking.

Blah blah blah fishcakes.